Consumer Preferences for Local Chocolate Consumption. Implications from Market Segmentation at Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v9i4.1209Keywords:
Consumer preferences, chocolate, conjoint analysis, consumer segmentation.Abstract
In this paper, we present a study of consumer preferences for chocolate consumption at Ecuador. The objective of the study was to identify consumer preferences for the following attributes of chocolate: organic, origin, composition, flavour, packing, recognized brand image. A self-administered questionnaire was used with the possible combinations of the aforementioned attributes as a preference elicitation method. Conjoint analysis procedure facilitated the identification of customers’ preferences on product attributes, predict the optimal combinations of product attributes and show which attributes are the most important considering when they evaluating product alternatives. A cluster analysis with the preferred option was employed to identify distinct clusters that reflected respondents’ different product preferences. The results shows that the type of chocolate that will most satisfy consumer preferences is the organic, locally sourced, combined with nuts, bitter, and packaged with plastic cover with a recognized brand image. Four different groups of consumers were identified. The results obtained facilitate the future behavior of producers and marketers of chocolate in the Ecuadorian market to boost the consumption of locally produced chocolate.
References
Alianza para el Emprendimiento e Innovación. (2014). Cacao y chocolate. Boletín de Emprendimiento e Innovación (Vol. 1). Quito: Alianza para el Emprendimiento e Innovación.
Andrade D., & Flores M., (2008). Consumo de productos orgánicos/agroecológicos en los hogares ecuatorianos. Quito: El Chasqui Ediciones.
Aprile M.C., Caputo V., & Nayga R.M., (2016). Consumers’ preferences and attitudes toward local food products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(1): 19-42. http:// 10.1080/10454446.2014.949990
Aribarg A., Burson K.A., & Larrick R.P., (2017). Tipping the scale: The role of discriminability in conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(2): 279-292. http://10.1509/jmr.14.0659
Bernabéu R., Díaz M., & Oliveira F., (2016). Consumer preferences for red wine in the spanish market. Ciência e técnica vitivinícola, 31(2): 88-97. http://10.1051/ctv/20163102088
Bernabéu R., Díaz M., Olmeda M., & Olivas R., (2011). Preferencias de los consumidores de vino en función de su comportamiento de compra de alimentos. Distribución y Consumo, 117: 1-8.
Bernabéu R., & Tendero A. (2004). Diferencias en las preferencias de los consumidores de carne de cordero. Distribución y Consumo, 73: 101-107.
Confraria J., Ribeiro T., & Vasconcelos H., (2017). Analysis of consumer preferences for mobile telecom plans using a discrete choice experiment. Telecommunications Policy, 41(3): 157-169. http://10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.009
Córdova S., (2016, Sábado, 11 Junio). Ecuador es de los que más chocolate orgánico consume en Latinoamérica, Diario El Telégrafo. Available from http://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/guayaquil/10/ecuador-es-de-los-que-mas-chocolate-organico-consume-en-latinoamerica
Cordovez Gómez S. (2014)., Análisis de elección del consumidor en la industria chocolatera en el Ecuador. Degree Thesis. Quito: Universidad San Francisco de Quito.
Chowdhury M., Salam K., & Tay R. (2016)., Consumer preferences and policy implications for the green car market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 34(6): 810-827. http://10.1108/mip-08-2015-0167
Dian H., & Dedy R. (2015)., The quality of milk chocolate bars by substitution of cocoa butter, milk powder and lecithin soya - A preliminary study. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 5(4): 335-338. http://10.18517/ijaseit.5.4.544
Dogan M., Aslan D., Aktar T., & Goksel Sarac M. (2016)., A methodology to evaluate the sensory properties of instant hot chocolate beverage with different fat contents: multi-criteria decision-making techniques approach. European Food Research and Technology, 242(6): 953-966. http://10.1007/s00217-015-2602-z
Dos Santos Navarro da Silva R.C., et al. (2013)., Quantitative sensory description using the Optimized Descriptive Profile: Comparison with conventional and alternative methods for evaluation of chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2): 169-179. http://10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.011
Efraim P., et al. (2013)., Characteristics of cocoa butter and chocolates obtained from cocoa varieties grown in Bahia, Brazil. European Food Research and Technology, 237(3): 419-428. http://10.1007/s00217-013-2006-x
Erazo Castro J.S., & García Chang E.V. (2016). Análisis del consumo de chocolates en millennials de la ciudad de Guayaquil. Degree Thesis. Guayaquil: Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil.
Fálder Rivero Á. (2005)., Enciclopedia de los Alimentos. Café, té, chocolate e infusiones. Distribución y Consumo, 80: 117-131.
Farías P., & Fistrovic B., (2016). As preferências do consumidor aplicando o método de máximas diferenças consumer preferences using the maximum difference method. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 56(2): 138-151. http://10.1590/s0034-759020160202
González Y., Pérez E., & Palomino C. (2012). Factores que inciden en la calidad sensorial del chocolate. Actualización en Nutrición, 13(4): 314-331.
Gumirakiza J.D., Curtis K.R., & Bosworth R. (2017)., Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for bundled fresh produce claims at farmers’ markets. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(1): 61-79. http://10.1080/10454446.2017.1244786
Harwood M.L., Loquasto J.R., Roberts R.F., Ziegler G.R., & Hayes J.E., (2013). Explaining tolerance for bitterness in chocolate ice cream using solid chocolate preferences. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(8): 4938-4944. http://10.3168/jds.2013-6715
Jácome H., (2012). Elaboración de cacao y subelaborados. (Vol. 27). Quito: FLACSO - MIPRO. Centro de Investigaciones Económicas y de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa.
Jones E., (2016). Consumer preferences for coffee: hot and wet, or quality and flavor? Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(3): 350-380. http:// 10.1080/10454446.2014.949973
Liao F., Molin E., & van Wee B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3): 252-275. http: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
Maldonado S., Montoya R., & López J. (2017). Embedded heterogeneous feature selection for conjoint analysis: A SVM approach using L1 penalty. Applied Intelligence, 46(4): 775-787. http://10.1007/s10489-016-0852-5
Martín Cerdeño V.J., (2007). Consumo de chocolate, cacao y sucedáneos. Principales características. Distribución y Consumo, 96: 59-65.
Meeran S., Jahanbin S., Goodwin P., & Quariguasi Frota Neto J., (2017). When do changes in consumer preferences make forecasts from choice-based conjoint models unreliable? European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2): 512-524. http://10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.047
Mehra P., & Singh R., (2016). Consumer preferences and purchase decision-making for Micro-packs — An empirical study. Vision, 20(3): 224-236. http:// 10.1177/0972262916652806
Millan E., & Mittal B., (2017). Consumer preference for status symbolism of clothing: the case of the Czech Republic. Psychology and Marketing, 34(3): 309-322. http:// 10.1002/mar.20990
Molina Vivero M.D. (2017). Investigación para determinar la aceptación de los pobladores del distrito metropolitano de Quito de bombones en base a chocolate ambateño. Degree Thesis. Quito: Universidad de las Américas.
Mugera A., Burton M., & Downsborough E., (2017). Consumer preference and willingness to pay for a local label attribute in western australian fresh and processed food products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(4): 452-472. http:// 10.1080/10454446.2015.1048019
Naranjo Chiriboga M.P., (2010). Del gran cacao a los chocolates río arriba. In H. Jácome (Ed.), Boletín mensual de análisis sectorial de MIPYMES. Sector Agroindustrial. (Vol. 3, pp. 4-5). Quito: FLACSO - MIPRO. Centro de Investigaciones Económicas y de la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa.
Norhayati H., & Ayob M.K., (2014). Sensory quality of pilot-scale prebiotic chocolates in Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana, 43(9): 1333-1344.
Ramos Á., Ramos C., & Ramos R., (2004). Las preferencias de los consumidores en el sector turístico. Estudios Turísticos, 159: 29-40.
Reyes S., (2016). El chocolate nacional, con cifras a favor. Revista Líderes. Available from http://www.revistalideres.ec/lideres/chocolatenacional-cifras-produccion-consumo.html
Rodrigues J.F., Condino J.P.F., Pinheiro A.C.M., & Nunes C.A., (2016). Temporal dominance of sensations of chocolate bars with different cocoa contents: Multivariate approaches to assess TDS profiles. Food Quality and Preference, 47, Part A: 91-96. http://10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.020
Rodrigues J.F., et al., (2016). Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) panel behavior: A preliminary study with chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 54: 51-57. http://10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.002
Rousseau S., (2015). The role of organic and fair trade labels when choosing chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 44: 92-100. http://10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.002
Ryu J.P., Shin J.T., Kim J., & Kim Y.W., (2017). Consumer preference for edible insect-containing cookies determined by conjoint analysis: An exploratory study of Korean consumers. Entomological Research, 47(2): 74-83. http://10.1111/1748-5967.12203
Sandvik P., Nydahl M., Marklinder I., Næs T., & Kihlberg I., (2017). Different liking but similar healthiness perceptions of rye bread among younger and older consumers in Sweden. Food Quality and Preference, 61: 26-37. http://0.1016/ j.foodqual.2017.04.016
Shan L.C., et al., (2017). Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier – A conjoint analysis study. Meat Science, 131: 82-89. http://10.1016/ j.meatsci.2017.04.239
Shu S.B., Zeithammer R., & Payne J.W., (2016). Consumer preferences for annuity attributes: Beyond net present value. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2): 240-262. http://10.1509/jmr.13.0004
Sune F., Lacroix P., & Huon de Kermadec F. (2002). A comparison of sensory attribute use by children and experts to evaluate chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 13(7–8): 545-553. http://10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00057-5
Torres-Moreno M., Tarrega A., Costell E., & Blanch C., (2012). Dark chocolate acceptability: Influence of cocoa origin and processing conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(2): 404-411. http://10.1002/jsfa.4592
Wang J., Yue C., Gallardo K., McCracken V., Luby J., & McFerson J., (2017). What Consumers Are Looking for in Strawberries: Implications from Market Segmentation Analysis. Agribusiness, 33(1): 56-69. http://10.1002/agr.21473
Wang M., Chen W., Huang Y., Contractor N.S., & Fu Y., (2016). Modeling customer preferences using multidimensional network analysis in engineering design. Design Science, 2. http://10.1017/dsj.2016.11
Zambrano A. (2016). EL CACAO ecuatoriano: un producto de consumo creciente. Revista El Agro. Available from http://www.revistaelagro.com/el-cacao-ecuatoriano-un-producto-de-consumo-creciente/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
