Assessing CO2 Emissions Reduction: Progress toward the Kyoto Protocol Goals in the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v5i11.895Keywords:
Cap and Trade, Climate Change, GHG Emissions, Kyoto Protocol.Abstract
The second phase of the Kyoto Protocol began in 2008. European nations had committed to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) by an average of 8 percent from the base year 1990 by the end of 2012. A little less than half of the actual reduction in GHG emissions was achieved by implementing a market-based cap and trade mechanism. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of cap and trade as the preferred method for reducing carbon emissions. To do this, an examination is made of emissions for 14 European countries that are the largest GHG emitters in Europe. We conclude that using cap and trade in combination with other measures that reduce GHG emissions led to the EU achieving its Kyoto Protocol goals.
References
Aldy, J. E. and Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. Journal of Environment & Development 21(2), 152-80.
Bel, G. and Stephan, J. (2015). Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis. Energy Economics 49, 531-39.
Dales, J. H. (1968) Pollution, Property, and Prices. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ellerman, D. and Buchner, B. (2008). Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005-06 emission data. Environmental Resources Economics 41, 267-87.
European Environmental Agency (EEA). (2013). Greenhouse Gas Data Viewer. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer.
______. EEA EU ETS Data Viewer, 2013. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data- viewers/emissions-trading-viewer.
______. EEA Report No. 10/2013: Trends and Projections in Europe 2013—Tracking Progress towards Europe's Climate and Energy Targets until 2020. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/publications/trends-and-projections-2013.
______. Why did greenhouse gas emissions decrease in the EU in 2011? Annual European Union Greenhouse Gas inventory 1990-2011 and Inventory Report 2013. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2013.
Gillis, J. (2015) Short answers to hard climate questions. New York Times (December 1), D6.
Hahn, R. and Hester, G. (1989). Where did all the markets go? An analysis of EPA’s emissions trading program. Yale Journal on Regulations 9 (1), 109-53.
Kolbert, E. (2015) The weight of the World. The New Yorker (August 24) 91 (24), 24-30.
Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5 (3), 395-418.
Murray, B. C., Maniloff, P. T., Murray, E. M. (2013). Why have the greenhouse emissions in RGGI states declined? An econometric attribution to economic, energy market, and policy factors. Duke Environmental and Energy Economics Working Paper Series EE14-01.
Sopher, P. and Mansell, A. (2013). The world’s carbon markets: A case study guide to emissions trading. Retrieved from www.edf.org/sites/default/files/EDF_IETA_EU%20ETS_Case_Study_May_2013.pdf.
Tietenberg, T. (2003). The tradable–permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, no. 3, 400-19.
Tietenberg, T. H. (2013). Reflections on carbon pricing in practice. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7, issue 2, 313-29.
Tietenberg, T. and Lewis, L. (2009). Environmental Economics and Policy. 6th edition. Boston: Pearson (Addison Wesley).
UNFCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, 1998. Retrieved from unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
