Sustainability of Government Debt in Sri Lanka

Authors

  • OG Dayaratna-Banda Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Peradeniya Sri Lanka
  • A A S Priyadarshanee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i7.551

Keywords:

Government debt, Debt Ratios, Augmented Dicky-Fuller and Phillips-Perron Tests, Chow Test

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of government budget deficit on debt sustainability in Sri Lanka by using a novel methodological approach. The study used annual time series data from 1960 to 2012 in Sri Lanka for empirical testing. Sustainability of government debt is tested by using face value, market value and discounted market value of government debt as a proportion of GDP. Discounted market value of debt to GDP ratio was calculated using weighted average interest rate. Results of Augmented Dickey Fuller and Phillips-Perron tests indicate that debt ratios are non-stationary implying the existence of an unsustainable debt outlook. Results of the Chow test, employed to test if a structural break can be observed in 1978 as a result of moving away from the command economy to a market-oriented economy, indicate that the policy change has not led to have any fixed change in the mean of debt serials. The results compel us to conclude that public debt in Sri Lankan is not sustainable, so that a switch is required from foreign debt to other sources of financing of fiscal deficit or deficit reduction.

References

Ahuja, H.L. (2007). Macroeconomic theory & policy: Advance analysis. Thand, New Delhi.

Akcay, O. C., C. E. Alper, and S. Ozmucur. (2005). Budget Deficit, Inflation and Debt Sustainability: Evidence from Turkey (1970-2000). Bogazici University Research Papers, No. 200112.

Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (1960-2008). Annual Reports. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.

Cuttington, John T. (1997). Analyzing the Sustainability of Fiscal Deficits in Developing Countries. Department of Economics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C..

Goldstein, M. (2003). Debt Sustainability, Brazil and the IMF. Working Paper, Institute of International economics.

Gupta, K.L. (1992). Budget Deficits and Economic Activity in Asia, London: Routledge.

Hamilton, J. D. and M. Flavin. (1986). On the Limitation of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing. American Economic Review 76: 808-819.

Jayawickama, Ananda. (2004). Fiscal Policy Sustainability: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Economic Journal 5(1): 51-69.

Jayawickrama, Ananda and Tilak Adeysinghe. (2006). Sustainability of Fiscal Deficits: The U. S. Experience 1929-2004. SCAPE Working Paper Series, Paper No. 2007/01, Department of Economics, National University of Singapore: 1-28

Kremers, J. M. (1988). Long Run Limits on the US Federal Debt. Economics Letters 28:259-62.

Pasinetti, L.L. (1998). The Myth (or folly) of the 3% Deficit/GDP Maastricht Parameter. Cambridge Journal of Economics 22:117-136.

Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361-1401.

Siriwardana, K.K.M. (1997). An Analysis of Fiscal Sustainability in Sri Lanka. Staff Studies. Central Bank of Sri Lanka: 80-108.

Wilcox, David W. (1989). The Sustainability of Government Deficits: Implications of the Present Value Borrowing Constraint. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 21: 291-306.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-20

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 7 (2014): July

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).