The Problems of Interpretation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the European Court of Human Rights

Authors

  • Ivanets Ivan Petrovich Ditector of dissertation projects. Graduate School of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i6.529

Keywords:

European Convention, Protection of Human Rights, Court, legal systems

Abstract

According to the clause 1 of Article 32 of the European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the European Convention or the Convention) the competence of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Court or the Court) extends to all issues of interpretation and application of the Convention and its protocols.

Thus, the European Convention makes the Court the only tool of the way of understanding of the rights and freedoms protected by it. Interpretation of the provisions of Convention lies in the basis of the Court activity as immovable clod that stands guard for protection of human rights, and that is a place where the State is directly responsible before a human. 

Author Biography

  • Ivanets Ivan Petrovich, Ditector of dissertation projects. Graduate School of Ukraine

    Ditector of dissertation projects.
    Graduate School of Ukraine

References

Dear editor, if you have any suggestions and comments, author will finalize the scientific text according to your wishes.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-23

Issue

Section

Article