A Novelty in Turkish Commercial Life: Execution of QR-Code on Cheques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v7i12.1079Keywords:
Cheque, QR-Code, Postdated Cheque, Cheque Leaf, Payment of Cheque, Turkish Commercial Code, Turkish Commercial Law, Negotiable Instruments LawAbstract
Cheque is an important payment instrument in commercial life. Regulations on cheques, which have a very common application in Turkish law, are included in Articles between 780 and 823 of the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) No. 6102 and in the Cheque Act No. 5941. Law No. 6728 dated July 15, 2016 have introduced significant changes and novelties in the regulations related to the cheques in both laws. In the preamble of the law, it has stated that these changes were the result of the necessity of introducing new regulations for the purposes of a) the speed and security requirements that cheques necessitate, b) widespread payment by cheque, c) the foundation of cheque holders' protection due to the increase in bounced cheque.
Among the most important of these changes is that the QR-Code and serial number are accepted as a compulsory form requirement for the validity of cheques. In this study, the detection of novelties related to the QR-Code application expected to give functionality to the cheques and the effects of these regulations are discussed. The QR-Code application is a convenient method to ensure the tracing of the cheques and applicability of statutory regulations on cheques.
According to the general acceptance in Turkish law, bills of exchange are bills, notes and cheques. These bills of exchange have the ability of negotiability and public security in the case of the qualification of the promissory notes or bearer cheques. Furthermore, the introduction of the QR-Code application on the one hand and the criminal arrangements envisaged in the case of bounced cheques, on the other hand, have led to reaching its final point of the security in terms of cheques.
Although cheques are a payment instrument by its qualification, it is also used as a credit instrument due to the possibility of arranging the postdated cheque in Turkish trade practice. Making special arrangements in order to ensure particular protection for the cheque and attractiveness of the cheque have become inevitable in this situation. The risk of bounced cheques in practice is significantly reduced with the aim of protecting the cheque holders prescribed by the amendments.References
Can, M. (2015). Kıymetli Evrak Hukuku. Ankara.
Çöl, H. C. (2004). İleri Tarihli Çeke İlişkin Sorunlar. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 53(1), pp. 195-220.
Güler, M. (1990). Sonraki Tarihli Çekler ve Uygulamada Ortaya Çıkan Sorunlar. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi(2), pp. 171-179.
https://www.findeks.com/findeks-hakkinda. (2017). Retrieved October 5, 2017
https://www.findeks.com/kredi-kayit-burosu. (2017). Retrieved October 27, 2017
https://www.riskmerkezi.org/tr/istatistikler/23. (2017). Retrieved October 30, 2017
Hürriyet Newspaper. (2017, January 28).
Oğuz, S. (2014). Zayi Edilen Boş Çek Yapraklarının Mahkeme Tarafından İptaline Karar Verilip Verilemeyeceği Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler. Bankacılar Dergisi(90), pp. 33-50.
Öztan, F. (2016). Kıymetli Evrak Hukuku (20 ed.). Ankara.
Poroy, R., & Tekinalp, Ü. (2013). Kıymetli Evrak Hukuku Esasları. İstanbul.
Pulaşlı, H. (2017). Kıymetli Evrak Hukukunun Esasları (5 ed.). Ankara.
Soydal, O. (2010). 5237 Sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu ve Yeni Çek Kanunu Işığında Karşılıksız Çek Keşide Etme Suçu. Ankara.
Tekinalp, Ü. (2002). Adalet Bakanlığı Taslağında İleri Tarihli Çekler. Çekler Hakkındaki 3167 Sayılı Kanunla İlgili Adalet Bakanlığı Taslağı ve Karşı Görüşler Sempozyumu, (pp. 41-48). Ankara.
Ülgen, H., Helvacı, M., Kendigelen, A., & Kaya, A. (2016). Kıymetli Evrak Hukuku (10 ed.). İstanbul.
Yasan, M. (2014). Çek Kanunu Geçici m. 3 f. 1 Uyarınca Üzerinde Yazılı Düzenleme Tarihinden Önce İbrazı Geçersiz Olan Çekin Muhatap Banka Tarafından İşleme Konması (ve Özellikle Ödenmesi). TADD, 5(19), 321-354.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).