A Comparison of the Academic Achievement of Home School and Public School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v7i3.1037Keywords:
Education Attainment, Education System, K12 Learning, Schooling.Abstract
This study added to existing data on home school effectiveness by comparing the academic achievement of 66 home school students with 66 of their grade-level peers in traditional public schools. The two groups of students were matched on gender, race, and grade level and were administered the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery III. No significant difference in overall academic achievement was found between the groups. Both home school and public school students had average or above average scores in reading, math, written language, and broad knowledge (science, social studies, and humanities). The results further revealed a downward trend in math, reading and broad knowledge scores with increasing grade level. This trend suggests that home school and public school students experience a “developmental mismatch” between the changes that occur in adolescence and their school/home experiences, resulting in lower motivation, confidence, and academic performance.
References
Aiken, L. R. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Anderman, L. H., & Midgley, C. (1997). Motivation and middle school students. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 41-48). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Bielick, Stacey. (2008). 1.5 million home schooled students in the United States in 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (National Center for Education Statistics). Retrieved December 28, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009030
Boulter, L. T., & Macaluso, K. (1994). Individualized assessments of home schooling education. Home School Researcher, 10, 1-6.
Calvery, R., Bell, D. & Vaupel, C. (1992). The difference in achievement between home schooled and public schooled students for grades four, seven, and ten in Arkansas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN. (ERIC Document No. ED 346 082)
Cizek, G. J. (1988). Applying standardized testing to home-based education programs: Reasonable or customary? Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 7(3), 12-19.
Cizek, G. J. (1991). Alternative assessments: Promises and problems for home- based education policy. Home School Researcher, 7, 13-21.
Cizek, G. J., & Ray, B. D. (1995). An analysis of home education research and researchers. Home School Researcher, 11, 1-9.
Coalition for Responsible Home Education. (2017). Current homeschool law. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblehomeschooling.org/policy-issues/current-policy.
Conoley, J. C., & Kramer, J. J. (1993). Buros eleventh mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Costenbader, V. K., & Perry, C. (1990). The Woodcock- Johnson Psychoeducational Battery- Revised: Test review. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 8, 180-184.
Cummings, J. A. (1994). Review of the Woodcock- Johnson Psycho- educational Battery- Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara, (Eds.). The eleventh mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Eaton, S. (1993). Hostility fades as home schooling grows. The Harvard Education Letter, 9, 6-7.
Ebel, R. L. (1978). Stanford Achievement Test, 1973 Edition. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), The eighth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 98-102). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1996). Schools, families, and early adolescents: What are we doing wrong and what can we do instead? Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 17, 267-276.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.
Furst, L. G. (1994). Legal challenges to home schooling: An update for 1992-1993. Home School Researcher, 10, 7-14.
Gray, S. (1993). Why some parents choose to home school. Home School Researcher, 9, 1-12.
Hadderman, M. (2000). Trends and issues: School choice. University of Oregon: Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Retrieved from http://eric.uoregon.edu/trends_issues/choice/index.html
Home School Legal Defense Association (1997). Home education across the United States: Family characteristics, student achievement, and longitudinal traits. Purcellville, VA: author.
Jenkins, J., & Pany, D. (1978). Standardized achievement tests: How useful for special education? Exceptional Children, 44, 448-453.
Lines, P. M. (1987). An overview of home instruction. Phi Delta Kappa, 68, 510-517.
Lines, P. M. (2011). Home schooling. Eugene, Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Education Week.
Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17-27.
Lyman, H. B. (1991). Test scores and what they mean (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mayberry, M., Knowles, J. G, Ray, B., & Marlow, S. (1995). Home schooling: Parents as educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murray, B. (1996). Home schools: How do they affect children? APA Monitor, 27, 1; 43.
Rakestraw, J. F. (1988). Home schooling in Alabama. Home School Researcher, 4, 1-6.
Ray, B. D. (1988). Home schools: A synthesis of research on characteristics and learner outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 1, 16-31.
Ray, B. D. (1990). A Nationwide study of home education: Family characteristics, legal matters, and student achievement. Salem, OR: National Home Education Research Institute.
Ray, B. D. (1992). Marching to the beat of their own drum: A Profile of home education research. Paeonian Springs, VA: The Home School Legal Defense Association.
Ray, B. D. (1997). Strengths of their own: Home schoolers across America. Salem, OR: National Home Education Research Institute.
Ray, B. D. (2009). Homeschool progress report 2009: Academic achievement and demographics. Salem, OR: National Home Education Research Institute.
Riley, G. (2015). Differences in competence, autonomy, and relatedness between home educated and traditionally educated young adults, International Social Science Review: Vol. 90(2). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol90/iss2/2.
Rudner, L. M. (1998). Scholastic achievement and demographic characteristics of home school students in 1998. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(8). Retrieved from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/ epaa/v7n8/0.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995). Assessment (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Wasley, P. (2007, October). Home schooled students rise in supply and demand. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(7), p. A1.
Welner, K. M., & Welner, K. G. (1999). Contextualizing homeschooling data: A response to Rudner. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 7(13). Retrieved from http://ericps.crc.uiuc.edu/npin/library/ 2000/n00430/n00430.html.
Wilhelm, G. M., & Firmin, M. W. (2009). Historical and contemporary developments in home school education. Journal of Research on Christian Education 18(3), 303-315.
Wodrich, D. L. (1997). Children’s psychological testing: A guide for non-psychologists. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock- Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL; Riverside.
Wright, C. (1988). Home school research: Critique and suggestions for the future. Education and Urban Society, 21, 96-113.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
