Essential Skills for Project Stakeholders Identification: Sustainability Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v7i8.1061Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Project Skills, Stakeholder Identification, Sustainable Project.Abstract
In every life cycle of the project there are numerous people or organizations involved either directly or indirectly. While these type of people and organizations involved are called stakeholders and these may include the project team, client or customer, community, environment, suppliers, government. Stakeholders contribute and share their experiences, knowledge, and insights to support the project throughout its life cycle and therefore it is crucial to capture their input. However, before initiation of the project, stakeholders need to be identified. Following the fact that there are strategies and processes for stakeholder identification, it is not clear what skills are needed to employ those strategies for stakeholder identification. These skills are exceedingly important to have because in today's corporate world, the project team must be flexible in every aspect of their job and be able to complement their skills for the success of stakeholder identification. Using literature review, this paper seeks to describe the skills of project leader needed to identify the project team and the external stakeholders. Inductive approach was followed in this study and data was collected qualitatively using secondary sources. There are two essential skills i.e. relationship building skills and communication skills for internal stakeholders and four major skills i.e. communication skills, people skills, intellectual skills and conceptual skills for external stakeholders are identified for the identification of project stakeholders through literature review considering the sustainability issues in the project management.
References
, P. & Bellamy, C. (2012). Principles of Methodology - Research Design in Social Science. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Alladi, A. & Vadari, S. (2011). Systemic approach to project management: A stakeholder’s perspective for sustainability. Paper presented at the pp. 1-4. doi:10.1109/INDCON.2011.6139635
Ballejos, L. C. & Montagna, J. M. (2008). Method for stakeholder identification in inter-organizational environments. Requirements Engineering, 13(4), 281-297. Doi: 10.1007/s00766-008-0069-1
Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing Quantitative Data - From Description to Explanation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Bourne, L. & Walker, D. H. T. (2005). Visualizing and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-660. Doi: 10.1108/00251740510597680
Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Cobb, A. T. (2012). Leading Project Teams. (2nd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications
Davies, A., Gann, D. & Douglas, T. (2009). Innovation in megaprojects: systems integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review, 51 (2), pp.101- 125.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Dulewicz, V. & Higgs, M. (2003). Design of a new instrument to assess leadership dimensions & styles. In: Henley Working Paper HWP 0311. Henley Management College, Henley-on-Thames, UK.
Eskerod, P. & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36 – 50.
Eskerod, P. & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2014). Stakeholder Management Strategies and Practices during a Project Course. Project Management Journal, 45 (5), 71-85
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
Frye, C. M., Bennett, R. & Caldwell, S. (2006). Team emotional intelligence and team interpersonal process effectiveness. American Journal of Business 21 (1), 49-58
Galvin, T., Gibbs, M., Sullivan, J., & Williams, C. (2014). Leadership Competencies of Project Managers: An Empirical Study of Emotional, Intellectual, and Managerial Dimensions. Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance and Marketing, 6(1), 35-60, 35
Jepsen, A. L. & Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International journal of project management 27(4), 335-343
Jergeas, G. F., Williamson, E., Skulmoski G. J. and Thomas, J. (2000). Stakeholder Management on Construction Projects. AACE International Transaction, P12.1-P12.6.
Karlsen, J. T. (2002). Project stakeholder management. Engineering Management Journal 14(4): 19–24.
Landin, A. (2000). Impact of Quality Management in the Swedish Management, 1:2(1983), pp 83-87 Management, Lund University.
Northouse, P. (2013). Leadership - Theory and practice. (6th ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Olander, S. & Lundin A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction. International journal of project management, 23, 321-328
Olander, S. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction management and economics, 25 (3), 277-287
Pfeffer J. and Salancik G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. Harper & Row Publications, New York.
Prabhakar, G. P. (2008). What is project success: A literature review? International Journal of Business and Management, 3 (9). pp. 3-10. ISSN 1833-3850
Project Management Institute (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). 4th ed. Newton Square (PA): Author.
Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focused Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82 (1), pp. 233-250, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whithead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executives, 5(2), 61–75.
Schieg, M. (2009). The model of corporate social responsibility in project management. Business: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 315–321.
Silverman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.
Tolbert, P. S., & Hall, R. H. (2009). Organizations: Structures, Processes and Outcomes (10th ed). Upper Saddle River: International Pearson Education.
Turner, J. R. & Müller, R. (2005). The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects: a literature review. Project management journal, 36 (1). pp. 49-61.
Walker, D. H. T., Bourne, M. L. and Shelley, A. (2008). Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management and Economics 26(6): 645-658.
Werther W. B. Jr., & Chandler, D. (2011). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility - Stakeholders in a Global Environment. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Yueh-shian, L. (2011). Creating and Managing Global Organizational Teams. Journal of Global Business Issues. High Beam Research 5(1) 73-77.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).